<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deborah Webster&#8217;s Solution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/</link>
	<description>Frederik Pohl</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChurchHatesTucker</title>
		<link>http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/#comment-19899</link>
		<dc:creator>ChurchHatesTucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/?p=1487#comment-19899</guid>
		<description>LOLHUMANZ!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOLHUMANZ!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the blog team</title>
		<link>http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/#comment-19618</link>
		<dc:creator>the blog team</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 03:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/?p=1487#comment-19618</guid>
		<description>otakucode, Perhaps you should spend more time at &lt;a href=&quot;http://icanhascheezburger.com/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I Can Has Cheezburger&lt;/a&gt;. Then look up &quot;irony.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>otakucode, Perhaps you should spend more time at <a href="http://icanhascheezburger.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">I Can Has Cheezburger</a>. Then look up &#8220;irony.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: otakucode</title>
		<link>http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/#comment-19559</link>
		<dc:creator>otakucode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 17:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/?p=1487#comment-19559</guid>
		<description>Wow, it&#039;s as if the Enlightenment never happened.  It&#039;s as if the whole field of rational thought is still back sitting in the time before Aristotle.  She believes that scientists should chuck their objectivity and instead get cats so that they will be persuaded by their biased, fallible, and almost-always-wrong intuition to ruin their science.  Yeah, how about we don&#039;t do that?  She can move out into the wilderness and worship the winds and the stars and make believe that every tree is singing her a love song in the breeze, while we&#039;ll stay here in modern society, wherever everything of value was created specifically by people refusing to give in to these stupid impressions and gut urges human intuition throws in the way of reason.  

There is no reason I know of why human intuition, as an evolutionary tool to enhance the survival of the human species or individuals of it, would evolve to have an implicit understanding of the nature of consciousness.  Consciousness is an emergent property of a massively interconnected neural network.  We know very little about it, but know enough that we cannot say for sure whether or not animals have any form of consciousness of the kind we enjoy.  We have significant evidence to suggest they do not, given that even a small reduction in brain capacity in humans results in drastically reduced capabilities, but it is remotely possible that consciousness is a more simple property than we currently guess it might be.  But to suggest someone should get a cat, and then indulge in the rationally invalid practice of anthropomorphization, assuming complex and sentient behavior when much simpler models could completely explain everything... you&#039;d have to put forward a much better argument than &quot;I want them to be nicer, and I think this might make them nicer&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it&#8217;s as if the Enlightenment never happened.  It&#8217;s as if the whole field of rational thought is still back sitting in the time before Aristotle.  She believes that scientists should chuck their objectivity and instead get cats so that they will be persuaded by their biased, fallible, and almost-always-wrong intuition to ruin their science.  Yeah, how about we don&#8217;t do that?  She can move out into the wilderness and worship the winds and the stars and make believe that every tree is singing her a love song in the breeze, while we&#8217;ll stay here in modern society, wherever everything of value was created specifically by people refusing to give in to these stupid impressions and gut urges human intuition throws in the way of reason.  </p>
<p>There is no reason I know of why human intuition, as an evolutionary tool to enhance the survival of the human species or individuals of it, would evolve to have an implicit understanding of the nature of consciousness.  Consciousness is an emergent property of a massively interconnected neural network.  We know very little about it, but know enough that we cannot say for sure whether or not animals have any form of consciousness of the kind we enjoy.  We have significant evidence to suggest they do not, given that even a small reduction in brain capacity in humans results in drastically reduced capabilities, but it is remotely possible that consciousness is a more simple property than we currently guess it might be.  But to suggest someone should get a cat, and then indulge in the rationally invalid practice of anthropomorphization, assuming complex and sentient behavior when much simpler models could completely explain everything&#8230; you&#8217;d have to put forward a much better argument than &#8220;I want them to be nicer, and I think this might make them nicer&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/#comment-7619</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 03:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/?p=1487#comment-7619</guid>
		<description>No matter how long one co-exists with a domestic cat, one will never come to have a greater understanding of it.

I have come to accept this.

I have to go, my cat wants to eat food now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter how long one co-exists with a domestic cat, one will never come to have a greater understanding of it.</p>
<p>I have come to accept this.</p>
<p>I have to go, my cat wants to eat food now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Camp</title>
		<link>http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/#comment-7602</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Camp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 03:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/?p=1487#comment-7602</guid>
		<description>Scientists can&#039;t handle cats, because Nature is sane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists can&#8217;t handle cats, because Nature is sane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/2009/10/deborah-websters-solution/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 13:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewaythefutureblogs.com/?p=1487#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>I just got two. Pictures here: http://jeffcrook.blogspot.com/2009/09/behold-week-of-cats.html

Then again, I&#039;m not a scientist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got two. Pictures here: <a href="http://jeffcrook.blogspot.com/2009/09/behold-week-of-cats.html" rel="nofollow">http://jeffcrook.blogspot.com/2009/09/behold-week-of-cats.html</a></p>
<p>Then again, I&#8217;m not a scientist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

